Loading...
Loading...
Grant or receive the right to use IP — software, content, trademarks, or patents — on clear written terms.
A licensing agreement gives one party (the licensee) the right to use another party's intellectual property (the licensor's IP) under agreed terms — without transferring ownership. Licences cover software, content, trademarks, patents, designs, and know-how. Getting the scope, territory, exclusivity, and royalty structure right is what separates a profitable licensing deal from a disastrous one.
Common situations where this document is the right tool for the job.
You are licensing software or a SaaS product to a customer.
A company is granting another company the right to use its trademark or brand.
A creator is licensing content (photos, video, music) for commercial use.
Technology IP (patents, know-how) is being licensed to a manufacturer.
A merchandising deal involves using someone else's brand on physical products.
You are documenting an internal group licensing arrangement between related companies.
The essential provisions every licensing agreement should include.
Licensor (the IP owner) and licensee (the party receiving the right to use).
Precise description of the IP being licensed — specific trademarks, patents, copyrights, software modules, or content.
What rights are granted: to use, to reproduce, to distribute, to sublicense. Exclusive, non-exclusive, or sole licence.
Geographic scope — global, specific countries, or defined regions.
Licence duration — perpetual, fixed-term, or evergreen with renewal.
Upfront fee, ongoing royalty (flat, percentage of revenue, per-unit), minimum royalty commitments, and payment schedule.
Licensee's obligation to report usage or sales, and licensor's right to audit the licensee's books to verify royalty calculations.
For trademark licences, licensor's right to approve uses, inspect products, and require quality standards. Without quality control, a trademark licence can void the trademark's legal protection.
Who owns improvements or derivative works — usually the licensor, unless the licensee has specific rights negotiated.
Grounds for termination (breach, insolvency, failure to meet minimum performance) and what happens to stock and customer relationships on termination.
Licensor warrants it owns the IP and has the right to license; licensee indemnifies licensor for misuse. Typically excludes consequential loss and caps liability.
A licence lets the IP owner keep ownership (and future value) while generating cash now. This is the fundamental trade at the heart of most software, media, and consumer-goods businesses.
Percentage-of-revenue or per-unit royalties align licensor and licensee incentives. The licensee only pays when they earn; the licensor earns more if the licensee succeeds.
A badly-structured licence (over-broad grant, no quality control, no termination for non-performance) can destroy the value of IP. A tight licence preserves value.
Without a written licence, disputes sometimes result in courts finding an implied licence or even an implied transfer. Written licences define exactly what is — and is not — granted.
Yes. A licensing agreement is an ordinary commercial contract under Australian law. Electronic signatures on it are recognised as valid under the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth)and the state-based equivalents (e.g. Electronic Transactions Act 2000 (NSW), Electronic Transactions (Victoria) Act 2000, Electronic Transactions (Queensland) Act 2001).
Under section 10 of the Commonwealth Act, an electronic signature is valid if it identifies the signer, indicates their intent to be bound, and uses a method as reliable as appropriate in the circumstances. SignBolt captures timestamp, IP address, and signer identity — which meets this "reliable method" test for ordinary commercial signing.
Certain document types are excluded from electronic-signing provisions in some states (wills, statutory declarations in some contexts, land titles documents). A licensing agreement is not in those excluded categories — electronic signature is valid.
This page is general information, not legal advice. For high-value or unusual arrangements, obtain a one-off review from a qualified Australian legal practitioner.
Questions we get about the Licensing Agreement template.
An assignment transfers ownership of the IP from the original owner to the transferee. A licence grants the right to use the IP while ownership stays with the licensor. Assignments are typically one-off transactions (sell the patent); licences are ongoing revenue-generating relationships (royalty for use). Most IP deals are structured as licences to preserve ownership and residual value.
A non-exclusive licence gives the licensee the right to use the IP but allows the licensor to license to others as well. An exclusive licence prohibits the licensor from licensing to anyone else in the defined scope (and usually prevents the licensor itself from using the IP in that scope). A sole licence is a middle ground: the licensor cannot license to others but can still use the IP themselves.
Common structures: (a) fixed upfront fee, no ongoing royalty (software perpetual licence, stock photo); (b) percentage of licensee's revenue from the licensed IP (common for media, merchandise — typically 5-25%); (c) per-unit royalty (manufactured products — e.g. $1 per unit sold); (d) minimum guaranteed royalty with percentage kicker (common for big-brand licensing deals). Choose the structure that fits the business model and incentivises performance.
Yes. Licensing agreements are ordinary commercial contracts covered by the Electronic Transactions Act 1999 (Cth). Electronic signatures are valid. SignBolt produces an audit-trail PDF that is accepted as primary evidence of the licence's terms and execution date.
Under Australian trademark law (and most jurisdictions), a trademark owner must maintain control over how the trademark is used to preserve its protected status. Failure to enforce quality standards can result in the trademark becoming 'naked' and losing its legal protection. Every trademark licence should include specific quality standards, approval rights over marketing materials, and audit rights.
Usually the licensor, under a grant-back clause. Some negotiated deals split ownership: licensor owns improvements that relate directly to the licensed IP; licensee owns improvements that are standalone or broader. For software, this is particularly important — decide up front whether bug fixes, customisations, and integrations belong to the licensor or the licensee.
Most licences include a sell-off period — typically 3-6 months during which the licensee can continue selling existing inventory at agreed royalty rates. After the sell-off period, remaining inventory must be destroyed or returned to the licensor. Without a sell-off clause, the licensee could be left with stranded inventory it cannot legally sell.
Free plan covers 3 documents per month — more than enough to get this signed today. No credit card required.